Naturalism: A Critical Analysis by William Lane Craig, J.P. Moreland

By William Lane Craig, J.P. Moreland

Naturalism presents a rigorous research and critique of the most important different types of modern philosophical naturalism. The authors recommend the thesis that modern naturalism could be deserted, in mild of the intense objections raised opposed to it. participants draw on quite a lot of themes together with: epistemology, the philosophy of technological know-how, the philosophy of brain and business enterprise, and common theology.

Show description

Read Online or Download Naturalism: A Critical Analysis PDF

Similar analysis books

Nonstandard Analysis

Nonstandard research used to be initially constructed by way of Robinson to scrupulously justify infinitesimals like df and dx in expressions like df/ dx in Leibniz' calculus or perhaps to justify innovations reminiscent of [delta]-"function". besides the fact that, the process is far extra common and used to be quickly prolonged through Henson, Luxemburg and others to a great tool in particular in additional complicated research, topology, and practical research.

Understanding Gauguin: An Analysis of the Work of the Legendary Rebel Artist of the 19th Century

Paul Gauguin (1848-1903), a French post-Impressionist artist, is now famous for his experimental use of colour, synthetist variety , and Tahitian work. Measures eight. 5x11 inches. Illustrated all through in colour and B/W.

Extra resources for Naturalism: A Critical Analysis

Example text

Still, we will challenge this option. Could the methodological component of Core Scientism be a substantive Farewell to philosophical naturalism 19 necessary truth? The claim that it is implies that (a) there is a necessary nature, or essence, of every legitimate method of acquiring knowledge and (b) this essence makes the methodological component of Core Scientism a substantive necessary truth. Suppose, then, that the methodological component of Core Scientism is the correct description of such an essence and thus is a substantive necessary truth.

7 See Donald Davidson, “Mental Events,” in L. Foster and J. : University of Massachusetts Press, 1970), 79–101; and David Papineau, Philosophical Naturalism (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993). Roy Wood Sellars seems to endorse a version of this view, resting on “levels of causation” rather than supervenience, in The Philosophy of Physical Realism (New York: Macmillan, 1932). D. ), Contemporary Materialism (London: Routledge, 1995). For assessments of contemporary versions of nonreductive naturalism, including those of Davidson and Papineau, see Paul Moser, Philosophy After Objectivity (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993), chap.

The dilemma applied W. V. 11 Epistemology, by Quine’s lights, is but a chapter in the book of empirical psychology; so epistemology offers no encouragement to first philosophy. Quine’s own version of Core Scientism, his epistemological naturalism, is itself, however, an instance of philosophy prior to the empirical sciences. To meet this objection, Quine must show that his epistemological naturalism is a thesis or at least a warranted product of the empirical sciences. Quine does not discharge this burden, because the empirical sciences, as we have noted, do not make sweeping, monopolistic claims about the status of epistemology – even if an individual scientist makes such claims on occasion, in a moment of epistemological chauvinism.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.28 of 5 – based on 31 votes