The visual neurosciences by John S. Werner, Leo M. Chalupa

By John S. Werner, Leo M. Chalupa

Visible technological know-how is the version method for neuroscience, its findings suitable to all different parts. this huge choice of papers by means of best researchers within the box becomes a necessary reference for researchers and scholars in visible neuroscience, and may be of significance to researchers and pros in different disciplines, together with molecular and mobile biology, cognitive technology, ophthalmology, psychology, computing device technological know-how, optometry, and schooling. Over a hundred chapters conceal the total box of visible neuroscience, from its old foundations to the newest examine and findings in molecular mechanisms and community modeling. The e-book is prepared via topic--different sections hide such matters because the heritage of imaginative and prescient technological know-how; developmental approaches; retinal mechanisms and strategies; association of visible pathways; subcortical processing; processing within the basic visible cortex; detection and sampling; brightness and colour; shape, shape,and item attractiveness; movement, intensity, and spatial relationships; eye events; realization and cognition; and theoretical and computational views. The record of participants comprises best foreign researchers in visible technological know-how.

Show description

Read or Download The visual neurosciences PDF

Best neuroscience books

The Mind at Night: The New Science of How and Why We Dream

Psychologists and philosophers have lengthy grappled with the mysteries of dreaming, and now-thanks mostly to contemporary techniques in mind imaging -neuroscientists are beginning to subscribe to the dialog. during this groundbreaking ebook, award-winning journalist Andrea Rock lines the short yet interesting heritage of this rising box.

Receptors: Model Systems and Specific Receptors

Receptors begin the capacity in which mobile regulators exert their activities on the right track cells. as a result of the principal position of cell-cell conversation and sign transduction, receptors are of intrinsic curiosity to neuroscientists. Receptor reports make the most of either conventional equipment of study and sleek molecular strategies.

Extra resources for The visual neurosciences

Example text

1997) shows that the timing of pre- and postsynaptic activity determine the polarity of the change in synaptic effectiveness that results from joint activity: this is increased when presynaptic firing occurs first and is decreased when it occurs after the postsynaptic firing. But is the time at which the switch occurs always the same at all synapses? Could it be different for synapses located on different parts of the dendritic tree? Is it even possible that there are different mechanisms at the same synapse that are reinforced at different pre-post intervals (Barlow, 1996)?

But theories can close your eyes as well as open them. One of the first experimentally satisfactory experiments I did on the frog’s retina gave a result that made nonsense of the theory I was testing, but I was so fixated by the theory that I nearly missed an important new fact that was staring me in the face. Having previously mapped the receptive field of a retinal ganglion cell, I measured its sensitivity to circular spots of increasing size. My theory predicted that while it was within the receptive field, sensitivity would rise either in proportion to the area of the stimulus spot or in proportion to its square root, depending on the type of unit.

I think it is plausible to suggest that the answer is “Yes” in both cases, and shall briefly discuss these possibilities. R I The first proposal moves almost as far away as possible from the integrate-and-fire model. This dealt primarily with the integration of inputs to the neuron through different synapses, which I shall call spatial integration; temporal integration could occur through the persistence in time of postsynaptic potentials, but differences in times of persistence were assumed to be unimportant, and so far as this assumption was valid, one could regard spatial and temporal integration as separable processes.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.53 of 5 – based on 40 votes